Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Quentin

Pages: [1]
1
Request, ideas and thoughts / The handle
« on: February 29, 2012, 03:18:41 PM »
There's almost many handle type as there's players, i would talk here about my preference (shared by some people here in Geneva).
Manu from l'Equipe introduce me to the "big grip" thing, he's playing Tennis and he love having pretty big thing in his hand (yes haha). Basically he want to have a tennis handle on his mallet.

Tennis racquet are made to be handle with one or two hands, the handle is almost square.
The rule think, and manu will correct me, is that your fingers can barely touch the palm of your hand when holding the handle.

I'm in this, i like having something to hold firmly, something that will absorb in some way the vibrations.
I know some people, like greg from CMD, who likes using golf grip, i can't.
I have pretty big hands and im feeling too tense when the handle is to small.


That being said i have started to mimic a tennis handle, the tricky part is to find a good material to have the same square shape, here's some pictures:
(The material used here is not that good, the cardboard will became pretty round when putting the tube around)










2
Request, ideas and thoughts / The Shaft and the whip
« on: February 28, 2012, 03:32:12 PM »
I have copied the discussion started by Shinscar about the flex of the shaft, let's continue here!

...
next topic.... whip! I've been looking at this a little bit just thinking about various set-ups of mallets.

check this out from Wiki regarding golf whip:

Quote
Shafts are quantified in a number of different ways. The most common is the shaft flex. Simply, the shaft flex is the amount that the shaft will bend when placed under a load. A stiffer shaft will not flex as much, which requires more power to bend and "whip" through the ball properly (which results in higher club speed at impact for more distance), while a more flexible shaft will whip with less power required for better distance on slower swings, but may torque and over-flex if swung with too much power causing the head not to be square, resulting in lower accuracy. Most shaft makers offer a variety of flexes. The most common are: L (Lady), A (Soft Regular, Intermediate or Senior), R (Regular), S (Stiff), and X (Tour Stiff, Extra Stiff or Strong). A regular flex shaft is generally appropriate for those with an average head speed (80-94 mph), while an A-Flex (or senior shaft) is for players with a slower swing speed (70-79 mph), and the stiffer shafts, such as S-Flex and X-Flex (Stiff and Extra-Stiff shafts) are reserved only for those players with an above average swinging speed, usually above 100 mph (160 km/h). Some companies also offer a "stiff-regular" or "firm" flex for players whose club speed falls in the upper range of a Regular shaft (90-100 mph), allowing golfers and clubmakers to fine-tune the flex for a stronger amateur-level player.
On off-center hits, the clubhead twists as a result of a torque, reducing accuracy as the face of the club is not square to the player's stance at impact. In recent years, many manufacturers have produced and marketed many low-torque shafts aimed at reducing the twisting of the clubhead at impact, however these tend to be stiffer along their length as well. Most recently, many brands have introduced stiff-tip shafts. These shafts offer the same flex throughout most of the shaft, in order to attain the "whip" required to propel the ball properly, but also include a stiffer tip, which cuts back drastically on the lateral torque acting on the head.
Widely overlooked as a part of the club, the shaft is considered by many to be the engine of the modern clubhead. Shafts range in price from a mere $20 to over $1200. Current graphite shafts weigh considerably less than their steel counterparts, (sometimes weighing less than 50 grams for a driver shaft) allowing for lighter clubs that can be swung at greater speed. Within the last ten years, performance shafts have been integrated into the club making process. Performance shafts are designed to address specific criteria, such as to launch the ball higher or lower or to adjust for the timing of a player's swing to load and unload the shaft at the correct moments of the swing for maximum power. Whereas in the past each club could come with only one shaft, today's clubheads can be fit with dozens of different shafts, creating the potential for a much better fit for the average golfer.

... obviously the head has a large impact on the shaft, but from the above it sounds like the shaft is a great way of increasing power.
I think if you want increased power you need increased accuracy which by the sounds of it a big sweet spot!

I like the way of gradeing the shaft flex. Bike polo shafts should do the same IMO.

Characteristics:
Strength - 7 out of 10
Flex (where 0 is rigid and 10 is spaghetti!)

I so want to build a new mallet now!

3
Others (shaft, mounting kit) / Shaft compatibility
« on: February 22, 2012, 01:04:42 AM »
Our custom bolt won't works in every shaft in the world, we have tested some of them and have made a "how to" document to build your own shaft "milk-ready".

Basically our custom bolt will hold in tapered part where it is ø13mm external. That is the theory if your shaft wall are 1mm thick.

Below this is the length you get after mounting our custom bolt. There's the shafts we have tested so far:

MILK: 101-102cm      
Rik: 101-102 / 110 (depend of the batch)      
Perrot del Mallet: 116cm (normal one not the light)      
Bloody Mallet: 102cm      
MKE (the orange one): 110cm    (need confirmation because Hugo way shorter with his shaft, like 93cm)   
Fixcraft (was before the two quality so should be the light one):   95cm      
Northern Std:   122cm (need confirmation because Riki from Japan had to adapt the nut to make it work)

Please relate me your own experience and i will update this post.

4
In progress / The next batch of Simple and Simple Caped
« on: February 22, 2012, 12:51:41 AM »
We are currently getting as much as feedback as possible to bring, if needed, some modification on the designs.
We will keep you informed here.

5
Head Simple Caped 1.0 (SC1.0) / What do you think of the cap?
« on: February 22, 2012, 12:26:58 AM »
As you can see in this picture the cap is pretty thin (3mm). We like how it feel and that his design allows us to keep the weight of the head low.



Over time the cap could become slightly concave. Some player notice it, some don't.

What do you think, could you imagine a stronger but heavier head?

6
Announcements / Why these forums
« on: February 22, 2012, 12:19:05 AM »
We want to improve our design every time we start a new production of heads.

We have our own ideas about how improve the next batch of MILK models but we all play on different soils, in different ways and in different weather  conditions so every opinion matter.

The best way is to give your feedback by model (S1.0, SC1.0) or shaft/custom bolt in the sections dedicated. The more information (when did you start using the head, type of ground, type of ball, etc).

If you have specific request or idea about things not done yet (more head sizes, other polo products) please use the "Request, ideas and thoughts" section.

Thanks for helping us on that.

7
Others (shaft, mounting kit) / Specifications
« on: February 21, 2012, 10:57:08 PM »

aluminum 7075 T5
Ø 18mm
1mm wall thickness
super tough
102 cm long
155 gr
custom bolt + screw mounted in[/li][/list]

8
Head Simple Caped 1.0 (SC1.0) / Specifications
« on: February 21, 2012, 10:53:58 PM »

9
Head Simple 1.0 (S1.0) / Specifications
« on: February 21, 2012, 10:25:06 PM »

10
Prototype 3 (Retro 4 and Retro 12) - October 2011

They are mainly a bit heavier than the Simple model (around 5g)

R4/RC4 (R for retro, holes are retro, and 4 for the number of holes and C for caped):



R12/RC12



11
Model Simple 1.0


and Simple Caped 1.0

12
Prototype 2 - August 2011

13
Prototype 1 - July 2011

Pages: [1]